Blog

Luis Majano

March 09, 2011

Spread the word


Share your thoughts

A few folks have asked how you can leverage MXUnit and MockBox to mock a super class class.  Here is a simple example to showcase this:

Class Parent A

<cfcomponent name="A"> 
<!--- send ---> 
<cffunction access="public" hint="" name="send" output="false" returntype="any"> 
<cfreturn parent="">
</cffunction> 
</cfcomponent> 

Class Parent B

<cfcomponent extends="A" name="B"> 
	<!--- send ---> 
	<cffunction access="public" hint="" name="send" output="false" returntype="any"> 
		<cfargument default="" hint="" name="name" required="true" type="string"> 
		<cfif arguments.name neq ""> 
			<cfreturn name="arguments.name"> 
		<cfelse> 
			<cfreturn>
		</cfif> 
	</cffunction> 
</cfcomponent>

Here is our test case, please note that we use the coldbox package for simplicity, if you are using mockbox standalone, then just follow the docs.

<cfcomponent extends="coldbox.system.testing.BaseTestCase">
<cfscript> 
function setup(){ 
    // create and prepare for mocking. 
    b = getMockBox().prepareMock( createObject("component","B") ); 
} 

function testSend(){ 
    // create a virtual super scope and mock a send method on it 
    mockSuper = getMockBox().createStub().$("send","Mocked Super"); 
    
    // inject the mock super into the variables scope 
    b.$property("super","variables", mockSuper); 
    
    // send method call 
    r = b.send(); 
    
    // use simple mxunit debug to show results. 
    debug(r); 
} 
</cfscript>
</cfcomponent>

So as you can see, the super scope is just another reference in the variables scope, so I can easily create a MockBox stub and mock away. You can also be more concise if you want to leave the methods intact in the super scope by creating a mock of the parent class:

getMockBox().createMock("A").$("send","Mocked Super");

 

Add Your Comment

(2)

Mar 10, 2011 09:03:09 UTC

by Chris Tierney

Thanks Luis for this great write up! What is you opinion on mocking a super class? Should it be mocked as the example provides or should it generally be treated as an all-in-one?

May 14, 2013 12:43:43 UTC

by duncan

Thanks for this useful post. It's a shame the blog has screwed up the layout of the code block. Also the date of the post is reading as 1111 for the year

Recent Entries

Into the Box 2025 | Plan Your Trip With Us!

Into the Box 2025 | Plan Your Trip With Us!

Are you ready to join us for Into the Box 2025 from April 30th to May 2nd in Washington, D.C.? Let’s make your trip planning as smooth as possible. Here you’ll find Airfare discounts, Hotel Deals and fun things to do to the the best out of your trip to D.C.

Maria Jose Herrera
Maria Jose Herrera
January 30, 2025
BoxLang YAML Support has landed

BoxLang YAML Support has landed

We’re thrilled to introduce the bx-yaml module for BoxLang!

This powerful new module brings seamless YAML parsing and emitting capabilities to BoxLang. You can now effortlessly serialize BoxLang native types—including structs, queries, arrays, classes, and more—into YAML. The same simplicity applies to deserialization, making it easy to work with YAML data in your BoxLang applications.

Luis Majano
Luis Majano
January 28, 2025
TestBox v6.1.0 Release

TestBox v6.1.0 Release

We’re super excited to announce the release of TestBox 6.1.0! This release introduces native support for BoxLang without the need for a compatibility mode, unlocking new possibilities for developers embracing BoxLang’s dynamic capabilities. Alongside this exciting update, we’ve added valuable features, improved functionality, and resolved key issues to ensure a smoother and more robust testing experience. Dive into the details and see how TestBox 6.1.0 makes your testing even more seamless and efficient!

Luis Majano
Luis Majano
January 28, 2025