I am so happy to announce that the last bug for BlueDragon 7 on ColdBox has been resolved. It was tricky, but it all came down to using "-" on the name of the thread being created.
If you have something like:
...
This would fail parsing in bluedragon 7 but work as normal in Adobe CF. So I had to replace and come up with better names:
...
And voila!!! It works!! So the final bug registered for ColdBox RC 2 has been resolved. Hopefully, no more bugs will creep up. If you have any, then send them in. As of now, THERE HAVE BEEN NO MORE REPORTED COLDBOX RC2 BUGS. This might cause a release soon!!
Luis
Blog
Recent Entries
Partner with BoxLang and Ortus at Into the Box 2025: Empowering the Future of Modern Software Development!
At Ortus Solutions, we’ve always been at the forefront of innovation in the ColdFusion ecosystem. From pioneering modern ColdFusion practices to developing cutting-edge tools and frameworks, we’ve been passionate to help and sup[port the community into shaping the future of web development.That’s why we decided to build BoxLang, our new JVM programming language that not only builds on the strengths of ColdFusion but takes modern software development to the next level.
Ortus Solutions & BoxLang at Jfokus 2025: Silver Sponsor and Innovator
We’re thrilled to announce that Ortus Solutions, through BoxLang, will be participating as a Silver Sponsor at the prestigious Jfokus 2025 conference! Taking place in Stockholm, Sweden, from February 3 to 5, Jfokus is one of the premier developer conferences in Europe, bringing together thousands of tech enthusiasts, thought leaders, and industry professionals.
Why BoxLang When You Have Kotlin, Groovy, Scala, and more…
As we approach a stable release of BoxLang and our continued marketing reaches more folks, many have asked about its purpose. Why create a new language when the JVM ecosystem already includes established languages like Kotlin, Groovy, and Scala, to name a few.
Add Your Comment
(3)
Dec 10, 2007 10:43:21 UTC
by Vince Bonfanti
Hi Luis, We investigated this, and it's not really a bug in BD, but a difference in the way CFTHREAD works. BD creates a variable with the name of the NAME attribute, and the "-" character is not valid in a variable name (but we should give a better error message). This is similar to CFQUERY, where a variable with name specified by the NAME attribute is created. Try the following and you'll get an error on both BD and CF: <cfquery datasource="mydsn" name="myquery-#createUUID()#"> ... </cfquery> Out of curiousity, what's the purpose of giving a CFTHREAD a random name? In BD, the NAME attribute is optional, in which case BD will give the thread a system-assigned random name (I don't know if the NAME attribute is optional in CF8). In any case, we're very happy that ColdBox is running on BD 7. Cheers.
Dec 10, 2007 11:04:26 UTC
by Luis Majano
Hi Vince, Thanks for your comment. I think the tricky part of solving it, was that you could not know what the error message meant. So via "Code Smell" the name became the culprit. >Out of curiousity, what's the purpose of giving a CFTHREAD a random name? Yes, the name in CF is mandatory. So I had to create a unique name as a thread is executed by the logger or cache. >we're very happy that ColdBox is running on BD 7. So do I. The performance of ColdBox on BlueDragon is exceptional.
Dec 12, 2007 17:05:36 UTC
by Aaron Roberson
Four days later I check your blog to learn that you've discovered the solution to this "bug". Glad to hear it and great job finding it!