I think that a standard is arising on the way a method is injected with a request bus. My naming was requestContext and I believe mach-ii and fusebox use both event. I think it would be benefitial for developers for me to change this to event. What are your thoughts on this? This would help if a developer wants to switch from one framework to another or doing a transition, if some of the similar elements shared in an MVC framework can remain the same. I am for changing it to event, but I would like to know you opinions?
Blog
Recent Entries
BoxLang 1.0.0 Beta 23 Launched
The latest release of BoxLang, Beta 23, marks a significant step forward in our journey to create the ultimate dynamic language for the JVM. Packed with powerful new features, important bug fixes, and thoughtful optimizations, this update is designed to make your development experience smoother, faster, and more reliable, especially after now starting to take 100s of comments and bug reports from our community.
TestBox Latest Updates and News!
We’re thrilled to have launched the new TestBox website and TestBox 6.0! If you haven’t had a chance to explore yet, visit TestBox to discover updated documentation, powerful resources, and features that make testing more efficient than ever.
Is Your ColdFusion Application Ready for the Future?
In a rapidly evolving digital world, maintaining performance, security, and scalability for ColdFusion applications is more challenging than ever. Whether you're using Lucee or Adobe ColdFusion, legacy systems can become a bottleneck for growth, innovation, and user satisfaction. The need to future-proof your ColdFusion applications has never been more critical.
But where do you start?
The Hidden Costs of an Outdated ColdFusion Application
As you...
Add Your Comment
(5)
Feb 27, 2007 14:48:06 UTC
by Sana
Hi Luis, This makes perfect sense, should have some compatibility to other frameworks, at-least vocabulary should be same, so new developers adopt more easily.
Feb 27, 2007 16:20:13 UTC
by Sami Hoda
Can this be a customizable parameter instead?
Feb 27, 2007 18:07:03 UTC
by Luis Majano
I have been going over this and I think the best way is to just call the method and pass the argument. It would then be up to the developer to name the argument. However, the type of the argument will always be: coldbox.system.beans.requestContext How does this sound?
Feb 27, 2007 19:09:58 UTC
by Sami Hoda
I suppose that works. Whenever there is a chance for flexibility, I'm for it.
Mar 05, 2007 19:19:15 UTC
by tony petruzzi
Actually most of the other frameworks let you change the name to whatever you want, they just use event as the default. But you are correct when saying that this would make it alot easier to transition from one framework to another. BTW great work. ColdBox is getting more and more attention lately. I haven't heard anything coming out of the Model-Glue camp.